醫聲論壇

測驗一下你是否擁有strange mind



To my 'selected' strange-minded friends:

Only great minds can read this
This is weird, but interesting!
↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓

fi yuo cna raed tihs, yuo hvae a sgtrane mnid too

Cna yuo raed tihs? Olny 55 plepoe out of 100 can.

i cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt! if you can raed tihs forwrad it.

I can read this
I am in the majority(55%) of human kind

就phaonmneal這個字看不懂是p????????l
那要算什麼呢?? (偽可愛)

這個測驗應該是表示....
人類在讀拼音字時也會用上一點讀象形字的本能吧?

image 寫:就phaonmneal這個字看不懂是p????????l
那要算什麼呢?? (偽可愛)

這個測驗應該是表示....
人類在讀拼音字時也會用上一點讀象形字的本能吧?

phenomenal ? 應是2e1a，而非2a1e

Nveer mnid! We sitll cna ctcah it. Rhgit?

好好玩！
竟然可以很順的看下來！
真的耶！英文字只要不差太多，都可以看得懂！

我全都看的懂耶 (偽可愛)
好好玩 (樂奔)

很早就聽過類似的說法，今天自己親身體驗，真的可以看得懂而且還滿順的耶

感覺認中文字更是基於這種圖像基礎

看得懂的大大，英文字彙與閱讀能力都是有相當程度以上的

這不是五百萬買得到的

底下這個完形心理學法則,說明了某些認字或辨視圖案的知覺歷程
遵循了哪些原則
不過看來歌劇迷大大舉的例子更複雜了
知覺歷程
組織完形法則
Gestalt Laws
http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Gestalt_principles
摘錄
其中一個原則

Past experience principle
In some cases the visual input is organized according to the past experience principle: elements tend to be grouped together if they were together often in the past experience of the observer. For example, we tend to perceive the pattern in Figure 10a as a meaningful word, built up from strokes which are grouped to form particular letters of the Roman alphabet (such as 'm', 'i', 'n', etc). Note that the individual letters are rather clearly and distinctly perceived as 'natural' parts of the connected figure, and are only slightly easier to discern and discriminate if further individuated through separation (10b) or coloration (10c). However, in addition to this standard segmentation into letters, the pattern 10a has many other alternate partitions, such as the one demonstrated through separation and coloration in Figures 10d and 10e. But, in contrast to the standard segmentation, discerning and discriminating these alternate components (some of which are 'non-letters') within Figure 10a is a cumbersome task, similar to the laborious search for the hidden shape in Figures 6c-e; furthermore, the standard segmentation is to some extent perceivable even in 10e, where it competes with the segmentation based on the similarity principle. The spontaneity and ease of the standard, dominantly perceived organization of the strokes into letters, is plausibly mainly due to past experience, that is, to our familiarity with words as written in the script form of the Roman alphabet. This particular organization might not occur for observers lacking such familiarity; furthermore, the alternate partition would presumably be natural for observers used to an alphabet whose letters would correspond to the sub-wholes in Figures 10d and 10e. Note also that in print perhaps the most potent Gestalt principle is proximity: simply inserting larger blank spaces between words than between letters (a device not used in antiquity) helps group together the letters correctly, and establish words as the salient visual units in the text. The importance of blank spaces is demonstrated by the difficulty wehavewhenreadingtextnotseparatedbyblanks an dev enmor ew henbl an kspa cesap pea rinwr ongpl aces.


Figure 10: Past experience principle 1.Although acknowledged by the gestaltists, the experience-based principle was deemed of secondary importance, compared with the other, stimulus-based principles, and easily dominated by them. As an example, in the pattern in Figure 10f, in which a slightly overlapping inverted version is added, the original stimulus is much harder to see, due to the appearance of numerous new salient sub-patterns, generated by continuity and closure.

參考資料
http://www.infovis-wiki.net/index.php?t ... stalt_Laws

ps偶英文不好,但全都看的懂,應該是平日常當"差不多先生"的緣故

這大慨就像電腦容錯系統,好比一個人變胖或變瘦在容忍範圍內都可認出來.