抗癌藥物肥了企業 瘦了病患荷包?

媒體怎樣報導醫界?醫界專業的觀點在哪裡? 歡迎論述,讓真相更完整的呈現!

版主: 版主021

回覆文章
頭像
newshine
榮譽院長級
榮譽院長級
文章: 91992
註冊時間: 週五 5月 14, 2010 10:52 am
擁有感謝: 19 次

抗癌藥物肥了企業 瘦了病患荷包?

文章 newshine »

李誠民
註冊會員
註冊會員
文章: 1467
註冊時間: 週三 6月 23, 2010 10:18 am

Re: 抗癌藥物肥了企業 瘦了病患荷包?

文章 李誠民 »

抗癌藥物肥了企業 瘦了病患荷包?---Yes!!!....政府還在幫著 Drug Industry宣傳與恐嚇國人?!!!
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/artic ... risks.aspx


http://articles.mercola.com/sites/artic ... raphy.aspx
Excerpts from a new book on mammography delves into the questionable practices supporting conventional breast cancer screening and reveals the politics behind the promotion of mammography
A 2011 meta-analysis revealed that mammography led to 30 percent overdiagnosis and overtreatment, which equates to an absolute risk increase of 0.5 percent. A 2010 study found a mere 2.4 deaths per 100,000 person-years were spared as a result of the screening
A recent article in the British Medical Journal exposes how Susan G. Komen for the Cure is using misleading statistics to persuade women to undergo mammography. Contrary to Komen’s overblown claims, the data shows mammography will only reduce a woman in her 50’s chances of dying from breast cancer sometime over the next decade by 0.07 percent
Cancer screening should NOT to be misconstrued as a form of cancer prevention. My top prevention strategies for breast cancer are listed


http://articles.mercola.com/sites/artic ... ancer.aspx
Story at-a-glance
Fructose, found in virtually all processed foods, may be cancer cells' preferred source of fuel
While all forms of sugar feed cancer, fructose in particular is used for cell division, speeding up the growth and spread of the cancer
The vast majority of Americans consume far too much fructose
If you have cancer, or want to prevent it, limiting sugar in your diet, and particularly fructose, is essential


http://articles.mercola.com/sites/artic ... risks.aspx
Although touted as superior, new 3D mammograms (tomosynthesis) appear to have no diagnostic advantage over standard mammograms, and pose a much higher risk
Tomosynthesis exposes you to two to three times the radiation because it is typically done in addition to your standard mammogram; it also involves breast compression, which gives tumor cells an opportunity to spread
Due to the higher radiation exposure, tomosynthesis presents an even greater cancer risk for dense-breasted women, whose breast cancer risk is already four to six times higher than average
A recent study found that eliminating unnecessary CT scans for children would prevent 3,020 children from developing radiation-induced cancers each year
Another study found that 95 percent of childhood cancer survivors develop chronic health problems as adults, compared to about 38 percent of adults in the general population
謝謝Newshine院長!!!....請指正!!!
頭像
newshine
榮譽院長級
榮譽院長級
文章: 91992
註冊時間: 週五 5月 14, 2010 10:52 am
擁有感謝: 19 次

Re: 抗癌藥物肥了企業 瘦了病患荷包?

文章 newshine »

英文太多懶得看了
(擦汗) (擦汗)
李誠民
註冊會員
註冊會員
文章: 1467
註冊時間: 週三 6月 23, 2010 10:18 am

Re: 抗癌藥物肥了企業 瘦了病患荷包?

文章 李誠民 »

最有問題的是Artificial sweeter--Asparatem(阿斯巴代糖,宣稱無熱量),;其次是果糖(Frucotose---只是形成三酸甘油脂--脂肪肝與臟器脂肪),;再就是Table sugar(蔗糖--雙糖),;這都是美國的經濟與衛教的錯誤觀念,;果糖主要是玉米澱粉提煉---High Frucotose Corn Syrup(HFCS)--毒澱粉(澱粉多(都)是基改玉米澱粉---GMO,;加發泡劑而來!!!....抱歉!!!我太懶了!!!
min
榮譽院長級
榮譽院長級
文章: 34408
註冊時間: 週六 10月 13, 2012 8:39 am
表達感謝: 39 次
擁有感謝: 18 次

Re: 抗癌藥物肥了企業 瘦了病患荷包?

文章 min »

癌症病患明知藥物沒有百分百治療效果,,還是得花大錢服用。
李誠民
註冊會員
註冊會員
文章: 1467
註冊時間: 週三 6月 23, 2010 10:18 am

Re: 抗癌藥物肥了企業 瘦了病患荷包?

文章 李誠民 »

"The multimillion-dollar company behind all those pink ribbons -- the Susan G. Komen Foundation – uses less than a dime of each dollar to actually look for a breast cancer cure... and that's just the surface of the problem"...美國乳癌防治基金會--Susan G. Komen Foundation 就是假藉慈善基金公益團體,行詐騙(?!)之實!!..
乳癌假陽性(False positive)在最近丹麥流行病調查報告出來後,可說是確定的事!!!
李誠民
註冊會員
註冊會員
文章: 1467
註冊時間: 週三 6月 23, 2010 10:18 am

Re: 抗癌藥物肥了企業 瘦了病患荷包?

文章 李誠民 »

乳言假陽性超過150%!!
blind faith
CR
CR
文章: 791
註冊時間: 週四 6月 26, 2008 10:21 am
來自: Grey area.....

Re: 抗癌藥物肥了企業 瘦了病患荷包?

文章 blind faith »

李誠民 寫:乳言假陽性超過150%!!
evidence?

Dr. Mercola ? only personal opinion.
'We are all just prisoners here of our own device'
vinecristine
CR
CR
文章: 899
註冊時間: 週一 3月 09, 2009 7:16 pm

Re: 抗癌藥物肥了企業 瘦了病患荷包?

文章 vinecristine »

李誠民 寫:最有問題的是Artificial sweeter--Asparatem(阿斯巴代糖,宣稱無熱量),;其次是果糖(Frucotose---只是形成三酸甘油脂--脂肪肝與臟器脂肪),;再就是Table sugar(蔗糖--雙糖),;這都是美國的經濟與衛教的錯誤觀念,;果糖主要是玉米澱粉提煉---High Frucotose Corn Syrup(HFCS)--毒澱粉(澱粉多(都)是基改玉米澱粉---GMO,;加發泡劑而來!!!....抱歉!!!我太懶了!!!
那現在市面上有零熱量糖(赤藻糖醇),安全嗎?
李誠民
註冊會員
註冊會員
文章: 1467
註冊時間: 週三 6月 23, 2010 10:18 am

Re: 抗癌藥物肥了企業 瘦了病患荷包?

文章 李誠民 »

那現在市面上有零熱量糖(赤藻糖醇),安全嗎?....太難了?! 我才疏學淺,不懂!!

但我知道玄米茶油切飲料,......玄米就是米糠油,油切茶就是綠茶!!!.....
米糠油與麻油,在去年美國心臟醫 學會年會才認可有降總膽固醇與壞膽固醇(LDL)及三酸甘油脂的功效,......我犯了廣告推銷之法則???!.......
李誠民
註冊會員
註冊會員
文章: 1467
註冊時間: 週三 6月 23, 2010 10:18 am

Re: 抗癌藥物肥了企業 瘦了病患荷包?

文章 李誠民 »

赤藻糖醇---照字面意思,應該是藻類寡糖( 純意思是如木糖醇--Manitol,...Xilytol等,;...8-12個單糖,分子量5000-10,000,是否是五碳糖?! 請指教!!!);
但可以肯定的與台糖寡果糖絕對不同,寡果糖還是果糖(聚合物?)----台糖生產的寡果糖是由蔗糖發酵而來,美國的寡果糖是直接(?)玉米水解而來!!!!
回覆文章

回到「★媒體報導VS醫界觀點」