http://articles.mercola.com/sites/artic ... ccine.aspx
• With human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates far below targets, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is redoubling efforts to promote HPV vaccine as an ‘anti-cancer’ vaccine
• Describing Gardasil or Cervarix, the two HPV vaccines, as ‘anti-cancer vaccines’ could be described as borderline fraudulent as they’ve never been proven to prevent cancer
• The HPV vaccine only contains two strains of HPV associated with cancer, but there are about 15 of them known to potentially cause cancer; in most cases HPV infection does not become chronic or lead to cancer but rather naturally resolves on its own within two years
• Deadly blood clots, acute respiratory failure, cardiac arrest and "sudden death due to unknown causes" have all occurred in girls after they've received the Gardasil vaccine
• Routine pap smear testing is a far more rational and less dangerous strategy for cervical cancer prevention, as it can identify chronic HPV infection and may provide greater protection against development of cervical cancer than reliance on HPV vaccinations
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/artic ... roven.aspx
• A new report published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute highlights increasing rates of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancers, and uses this as a platform to peddle "efforts to increase vaccination coverage"
• Research has shown that the HPV vaccine’s effectiveness is not only overstated (through the use of selective reporting or "cherry picking" data) but also completely unproven
• Ever since Gardasil vaccine was licensed in 2006, reports of serious adverse events have included autoimmune and neurological disorders sometimes involving clinical symptoms similar to cerebral vasculitis, an often-fatal condition in which blood vessels in the spinal cord and brain become acutely and chronically inflamed
• In more than 90 percent of cases, your immune system can clear up an HPV infection within two years on its own
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/artic ... eness.aspx
• An oncology dietitian has pointed out significant discrepancies in a new HPV vaccine effectiveness study that claims the vaccine’s effectiveness is “high”
• Recent reductions in HPV infection prevalence among young women in the US cannot be said to be due to introduction of Gardasil vaccine in 2006 and use of HPV vaccines by pre-teen and teenage girls since then; the data clearly shows that unvaccinated girls had the best outcome
• In 2007-2010, HPV prevalence dropped 27.3 percent in the unvaccinated girls, but only declined by 5.8 percent in the vaccinated group. In four out of five different measures, the unvaccinated girls had a lower incidence of HPV
• According to Merck’s own research before Gardasil was licensed, if you've been exposed to HPV strains 16 or 18 prior to receiving Gardasil vaccine, you could increase your risk of precancerous lesions by 44.6 percent. • Judicial Watch has received previously withheld documents from the DDHS, which reveal that the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has awarded $5,877,710 to 49 victims for harm resulting from the HPV vaccine http://articles.mercola.com/sites/artic ... utiny.aspx
• Ever since Gardasil vaccine was licensed in 2006, reports of serious adverse events have included autoimmune and neurological disorders sometimes involving clinical symptoms similar to cerebral vasculitis, an often-fatal condition in which blood vessels in the spinal cord and brain become inflamed. The new research suggests that cerebral vasculitis can be triggered by Gardasil vaccine.
• In more than 90 percent of cases, women naturally clear HPV infection from their bodies within two years without any complications, at which point cervical cells return to normal.
• Cervical cancer is usually preventable and curable if detected early enough through PAP screenings and prompt treatment is initiated, which has reduced cervical cancer rates by 70 percent in the U.S. since PAP screens became a routine part of women’s health care in the 1960’s. 102-9-3
癌症疫苗?!
媒體怎樣報導醫界?醫界專業的觀點在哪裡? 歡迎論述,讓真相更完整的呈現!
版主: 版主021
回覆文章
1 篇文章
• 第 1 頁 (共 1 頁)
回覆文章
1 篇文章
• 第 1 頁 (共 1 頁)
前往
- 我要活下去 (公開版面)
- ↳ 老仙ㄟ講古論今講座
- ↳ Dharma鄭逸哲醫法肥皂箱講台
- ↳ 肥皂箱秘密基地
- ↳ ★媒體報導VS醫界觀點
- ↳ 人物記實
- ↳ 衛生署長
- ↳ 年度疫情/疫苗
- ↳ 2007
- ↳ 2008
- ↳ 2009
- ↳ 2010
- ↳ 醫療生態
- ↳ 爭議文章版
- ↳ ★愛滋病患與醫護人員權益討論區
- ↳ ★ 談天說地,無所不談,就是不談政治
- ↳ ★醫療工商服務區(我愛紅娘)
- ↳ ★野人獻曝●花園一隅
- ↳ ★HIS醫療資訊廠商客服專區
- ↳ ★血汗健保
- ↳ ★二代健保
- ↳ ★醫門忠烈
- ↳ 花園子版
- ↳ ★ 漫畫及海報
- ↳ 愚公移山計畫暫存區
- ↳ 愚公移山vs.冷涼卡好
- ↳ ★CME繼續教育訊息專區
- ↳ ★ 審查制度的善與惡
- ↳ 政治事件聊天區
- ↳ ★工商服務專區
- ↳ 醫師人力供需討論專區
- ↳ 外籍學歷與外籍醫師問題
- ↳ 醫師替代人力問題
- ↳ 醫院醫師的問題
- ↳ 診所醫師的問題
- ↳ 法規規範
- ↳ ★波淘洶湧
- ↳ ★醫學生事務交流專區
- 秘密花園B區
- ↳ 診所CEO專區
- ↳ 藥價超級比一比
- ↳ 不友善藥廠與盤商抵制區
- ↳ 健保抽審guideline/criteria download 專區
- ↳ 健保申報疑問
- ↳ 人事問題
- ↳ 自費專區
- ↳ 軟硬體問題
- ↳ 電腦與網路在醫學領域的應用
- ↳ 診所對外關係
- ↳ 放假相關問題
- ↳ 醫療糾紛
- ↳ 綜合教室
- ↳ 專科簽到簿
- ↳ 藥物討論專區
- ↳ 家庭醫學科
- ↳ 皮膚科
- ↳ 內科
- ↳ 小兒科
- ↳ 外/骨/復健科
- ↳ 五官科
- ↳ 婦產科
- ↳ 精神科
- ↳ H1N1 and Flu及感染性疾病
- ↳ 醫療和健保法規實務
- ↳ 健保補充費與二代健保
- 評論
- ↳ ★焦點評論
- ↳ ★精選文集
- 公會及協會專區
- ↳ 全聯會與各縣市醫師公會專區
- ↳ 全聯會與各縣市醫師公會專區(秘密花園區)
- ↳ 中華民國診所協會全國聯合會
- ↳ 中華民國基層醫療協會
- 醫勞盟
- ↳ 台灣醫療勞動正義與病人安全促進聯盟【TMAL】
- 藏經閣
- ↳ 開業醫須知
- ↳ 111年度報稅專區
- ↳ 107年度報稅專區
- ↳ 106年度報稅專區
- ↳ 105年度報稅專區
- ↳ 104年度報稅專區
- ↳ 103年度報稅專區
- ↳ 102年度報稅專區
- ↳ 101年度報稅專區
- ↳ 100年度報稅專區
- ↳ 99年度報稅專區
- ↳ 97年度報稅專區
- ↳ 98年度報稅專區
- ↳ 96年報稅專區
- ↳ 95年報稅專區
- 論壇事務區(公開版面)
- ↳ ★公佈欄
- ↳ ★新手導引區
- ↳ ★意見反應與求助
- ↳ ★篳路藍縷
- ↳ ★醫界數位媒體工作版
- ↳ ★投票專區
- ↳ Poll小組討論工作區
- ↳ ★新手測試區
- ↳ ★友站連結